Rugby

Did NZ pay the price for their easy group?

first proper game, home they go, take nothing away fom France kin awesome I just think NZ needed a proper game before this, they just seemed like rabbits in the headlights. enormous talent obviously but seemed surprised at the French resistance. England v France, the world cup is surely alive, I just love the way it has not gone to plan, throw the world rankings out of the window!

Loosehead Sat 06/10/07 22:53

<< Previous

Next >>

Subscribe to question

Post an Answer

neo.
Sun 07/10/07
09:13

no i think France & England wanted it more . I think NZ & Aussies thought they were definates to win b4 the kickoff the arogant tw@ts. And both suffered. Didnt watch the NZ match as was steaming drunk after watchin the England match.

laurence2
Sun 07/10/07
12:03

New Zeal;and ''CHOKED'' again on the big stage loosehead.

Who would of thought we was talking about New Zealand & Australia going out at the quarter-final stage.{when did that last happen?}.

Its possible they payed the price for having an easy group, they never played the same 15 in any of the group matches, so tactically they may have payed the price of the rotation system.

England had some physical games ie tonga/samoa, and i believe that this stood them in good stead for the aussie game, they we're physically to strong for the aussies.

What chance now the two other underdogs winning ie Scotland & Fiji?

Now would'nt that be something.

Post an Answer

Submit the above question and answers

add to del.icio.us	add to digg	add to furl
add to reddit	add to Technorati	add to Blinklist
add to StumbleUpon	add to squidoo	add to ma.gnolia
add to Cocomment	add to Netscape	add to Fark